🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.