🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had come from mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with the American leader asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions resume.

Trump last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be ended by military means. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the primary solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this attack."