🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.