🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Background on the Original Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to officially classify the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse". The platform even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel revised the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was released long after the assassination, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its global government affairs account, X expressed approval of the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the new R18+ rating now implies platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.